Meaning and Normativity
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Inferentialism and the Normativity of Meaning
The paper addresses some frequent objections to the claim that meaning is normative, thus defending the inferentialist construal of meaning that does entail this claim. The objections we discuss are (i) that there is no norm that assertions should aim at the truth, (ii) that there are no norms commanding us how to speak and (iii) that a normative account is bound to collapse into a naturalistic...
متن کاملRule-following, Compositionality and the Normativity of Meaning
Is (C) a valid principle for natural languages? One traditional reason for believing so is that it can explain our ability to understand new sentences, i.e. sentences which we have never encountered before. The explanation says that, for this ability to be possible, the meaning of complex expressions must be determined by rules, so that, by knowing the meaning of the parts of a new sentence, an...
متن کاملNormativity and the meaning of endangered: response to Waples et al. 2007.
There has been increased interest recently in better understanding the meaning of endangered species as defined in the 1973 U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). Waples et al. (2007) provide an account that is, in part, a reaction to a position presented by us in Vucetich et al. (2006). Here, we extend this discussion with comments focused on Waples et al. (2007). In the ESA an “endangered species...
متن کاملInfinitism, finitude and normativity
I evaluate two new objections to an infinitist account of epistemic justification, and conclude that they fail to raise any new problems for infinitism. The new objections are a refined version of the finite-mind objection, which says infinitism demands more than finite minds can muster, and the normativity objection, which says infinitism entails that we are epistemically blameless in holding ...
متن کاملNormativity, Necessity and Tense: A Recipe for Homebaked Normativity
A reductive analysis of a concept decomposes it into more basic constituent parts. Metaethicists today are in almost unanimous agreement that normative language and concepts cannot be reductively analyzed into entirely nonnormative language and concepts. Basic normative concepts are widely thought to be primitive or elemental in our thought, and therefore to admit of no further (reductive) expl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Disputatio
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0873-626X
DOI: 10.2478/disp-2013-0009